| |
HTML (Web
Based) Intranet Applications - Is there a better way?
For the last several years the
majority of company intranet applications have been developed using a web based
interface. The major reasoning behind this has been deployment. A web based
application needs to be installed on the server side and as long as the clients
have a browser they are able to access the application. However, how many web
based applications have you ever seen that function as well as a windows
desktop application? HTML or web-based application interfaces are very limited
in functionality and the user needs to be continuously connected to the server
to work with data. HTML interfaces were originally used for displaying static
information, but keep getting stretched to the limit to mimic desktop
application functionality. I’ve seen several web- based intranet applications
fail miserably because the user experience just does not approach what the
desktop application can provide. End users expect a certain level of
functionality and ease of use, and unfortunately web applications make this
difficult to deliver.
Microsoft’s .Net Framework may
change all of that, and once the .Net initiative takes hold in the corporate
environment, it may change it quickly. .Net allows what MS calls “XCopy” which
means that if the .Net runtime is installed on a client machine, all you need
to do is copy the folder that contains the application itself and all of its
dependent DLLs onto the client and it will run. The result is no more
registering and un-registering DLLs. This once again makes developing Windows
Forms-based applications (desktop applications) a viable solution for intranet
application development in the corporate environment. With the introduction of
web services, clients can now connect to the corporate server, download data
onto their laptops via a desktop application into a “dataset,” disconnect from
the server, manipulate the data, and save it to their local drive in XML
format. Once re-connected to the corporate server, the client application can
reload the saved XML back into another “Dataset” (.Net supplies the plumbing to
do this for you!) and send it back to the server database. Developers can also
use “Remoting” which is the successor to DCOM for intranet data transport. This
offers binary data formatting which is considerably faster than the SOAP format
which is used by Web Services. Using a combination of these two technologies,
crafty developers now have the ability to design and implement an intranet
application that can check for the source of a client request. If the user is
on the corporate intranet, they can use “Remoting,” as it is much faster and
more efficient than SOAP, and if the request is coming over the firewall from a
remote site, they can use a Web Service that transports data via SOAP (XML).
As corporate applications become
more and more complex, the HTML User Interface becomes more cumbersome to
develop. With the .Net Framework in place, developers can now provide fully
functional desktop applications (which in general are a bit easer to develop
and less time consuming to build than their counterpart web app versions) as a
viable solution.
We’ve used the .Net framework
here at Knowledge-Management Associates for a defect tracking system that I
recently built using “Remoting” and a Windows Service that I developed using a
combination of VB.net and C#, and so far we’ve been very impressed by the ease
of development and the new exposed functionality and power that is now
available to all developers. I also recently built an Excel add-in that uses a
Web Service that is located on our corporate server for remote timesheet
management. I used the familiar UI of Excel for a rich end-user experience
instead of a web browser. The employee can connect to the web service, download
their time sheet (or create a new one), save it to their local drive, and, when
ready, reconnect to the web service and submit it back to our SQL Server
database.
Web-based applications may never
go away, but the question is whether we need them on the corporate intranet.
With the new exposure to functionality that .Net offers, I believe that there
will be a push back to the desktop application as the method of choice for the
corporate intranet.
|
|